An affordable VPN with solid global reach, a KPMG-audited no-logs policy, and a useful dedicated IP option. It has improved significantly since a serious incident in 2017 — which we cover honestly in this review — and is now a reasonable budget choice for the right user.
| PureVPN | PIA | Surfshark | CyberGhost | IPVanish | NordVPN | Proton VPN | ExpressVPN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £1.33/mo | £1.49/mo | £1.69/mo | £1.99/mo | £2.49/mo | £2.99/mo | £3.19/mo | £5.32/mo |
PureVPN is the cheapest VPN in our entire review set on its longest plan. The low price is the main draw — but read the history section before deciding.
PureVPN was founded in 2007 and is one of the older VPN services in the market. It is based in the British Virgin Islands — the same jurisdiction as ExpressVPN — and covers 6,500+ servers across 78 countries. It offers a dedicated IP address option, which is useful for users who need a consistent IP for work or banking purposes. The price is among the lowest in our review set on long plans.
Important: In 2017, PureVPN provided connection logs to the FBI that led to the arrest of a user. At the time, PureVPN claimed to have a no-logs policy. This incident is the most significant breach of trust in the VPN industry's recent history and must be disclosed in any honest review. Since then, PureVPN has undergone independent audits by KPMG and restructured its logging practices. We present the current state of the service fairly, but believe readers deserve to know this history.
Following the 2017 incident, PureVPN has taken steps to rebuild trust. Its no-logs policy has been independently audited by KPMG — a reputable firm — and subsequent audits have found no evidence of logging that would contradict the current policy. The company has also implemented an "always-on" audit programme, allowing auditors to check systems at any time without prior notice.
Whether you trust PureVPN now is a personal decision. The 2017 incident happened, the audits since then have been clean, and the policy has been materially restructured. Users for whom this history is disqualifying should choose Proton VPN or PIA. Users willing to judge on current performance will find a service that has worked to address its failings.
PureVPN delivers acceptable speeds on WireGuard — UK server speeds averaged 180–250 Mbps in our testing. This is adequate for streaming and general browsing but sits below the top performers in our review set. Long-distance connections are usable but not fast.
PureVPN unlocks Netflix US and BBC iPlayer with reasonable consistency, though results are not as reliable as ExpressVPN or CyberGhost. The streaming server experience requires more trial and error than services with dedicated streaming servers. Adequate for occasional streaming use, not ideal for heavy streaming reliance.
The PureVPN app is clean and reasonably straightforward. The interface is less polished than NordVPN or ExpressVPN but functional and easy to navigate for most users. The dedicated IP feature is well integrated — if that is your primary reason for choosing PureVPN, it works well.
PureVPN is the cheapest VPN in our review set on its longest plan. The dedicated IP option is available as a paid add-on — useful for specific use cases. Short-term pricing is less competitive.
PureVPN has done the work to rebuild trust after 2017 — the KPMG audits are genuine and the always-on audit programme is a step further than most competitors go. The price is the lowest in our review set and the dedicated IP option fills a genuine niche. However, we cannot recommend it as strongly as our top picks precisely because the history exists and cannot be erased. If budget is the priority and the history is acceptable to you, it is a reasonable choice. If privacy credentials are the priority, Proton VPN, PIA, or NordVPN are stronger options.
Get PureVPN →PureVPN is ideal for budget-conscious users who need a dedicated IP address, users who have read the history and are satisfied with the current audit programme, and those who need broad global server coverage at the lowest possible price.
Consider alternatives if trust history matters to you — Proton VPN and PIA have cleaner records. If you want better streaming or faster speeds, NordVPN or ExpressVPN are more capable.
Answers to the questions people ask most about PureVPN.
Yes, in 2017. PureVPN provided connection logs to the FBI that helped identify a user in a criminal case, despite previously claiming to keep no logs. This is a serious historical incident. Since then, PureVPN has undergone KPMG audits and introduced an always-on audit programme — but the history cannot be erased and should factor into your decision.
PureVPN has made genuine efforts to rebuild trust since 2017 — KPMG audits confirm the current no-logs policy, and the always-on audit programme goes further than most competitors. BVI jurisdiction adds another layer of protection. However, if trust history matters to you, Proton VPN, NordVPN, or PIA have cleaner records.
Yes. PureVPN offers dedicated IP addresses as a paid add-on. A dedicated IP gives you a fixed IP address shared by no one else, which is useful for accessing business networks, avoiding IP-based blocks, and reducing CAPTCHA prompts. It is one of the few VPNs in our review set to offer this feature.
PureVPN is the cheapest VPN in our review set on its longest plan — from around £1.33 per month on a five-year plan. The two-year plan comes to around £2.08 per month. Short-term monthly pricing is less competitive at £9.95 per month.
PureVPN is incorporated in the British Virgin Islands — a jurisdiction outside EU and US law with no mandatory data retention requirements. This is a positive for privacy despite the historical 2017 logging incident.
PureVPN has mixed Netflix performance. It can unblock some Netflix libraries but is less reliable than top streaming VPNs like ExpressVPN or CyberGhost. If streaming is your primary reason for getting a VPN, we recommend considering those alternatives.